Subject Ranking 2015-2016: Social sciences methodology

 

十一月 4, 2015

The Times Higher Education World University Rankings 2015-2016 social sciences subject ranking includes a wide range of narrower subject areas.

The full list of social sciences subjects used to create this ranking is:

  • Area Studies
  • Anthropology
  • Biomedical Social Sciences
  • Business
  • Communication
  • Criminology & Penology
  • Demography
  • Decision Support/Statistics
  • Economics
  • Education & Educational Research
  • Ethnic Studies
  • Family Studies
  • Geography
  • International Relations
  • Law
  • Library Science
  • Mathematical Methods in Social Sciences
  • Political Science
  • Psychology
  • Public Administration
  • Social Issues
  • Social Work
  • Sociology
  • Urban Studies
  • Women's Studies
  • Social Sciences - Other topics

Different weights and measures

The subject tables employ the same range of 13 performance indicators used in the overall World University Rankings, brought together with scores provided under five categories.

However, the overall methodology is carefully recalibrated for each subject, with the weightings changed to suit the individual fields.

The weightings for the Social Sciences ranking are:

Teaching: the learning environment – 32.5 per cent
Research: volume, income and reputation – 32.5 per cent
Citations: research influence – 25 per cent
International outlook: staff, students and research - 7.5 per cent
Industry income: innovation – 2.5 per cent

Criteria

No institution can be included in the overall World University Rankings unless it has published a minimum of 200 research papers a year over the five years we examine.

But for the six subject tables, the threshold drops to 100 papers a year for subjects that generate a high volume of publications and 50 a year in subjects such as social sciences where the volume tends to be lower. Although we apply some editorial discretion, we generally expect an institution to have at least 10 per cent of its staff working in the relevant discipline in order to include it in the subject table.

In rare cases where such data are not supplied, institutions are either excluded or public sources are used to underpin estimates.

View the full World University Rankings 2015-2016 methodology

Browse the 2015-2016 social sciences top 100 results

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
注册
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.
ADVERTISEMENT