Roots and branches

十二月 4, 1998

"Ancient English selfhood" and "perpetual rootedness" - are these serious criteria for 20th-century poetry? Valentine Cunningham's advocacy of Ted Hughes over Sylvia Plath (THES, November ) resorts to fundamentalisms of nation as bad as the gender fundamentalisms he claims to challenge.

The greatness of both poets will long survive biographical point-scoring about what their daddies did or whether an English or American poet is more likely to understand European "brutalisms". Hughes had no more "blood" right to the horrors of European history than Plath. Both were "tourists at the bullfight". The experience that yields a poem is not a matter of "rootedness" but of imagination, which can happen (or not) anywhere.

Angela Leighton English department University of Hull

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
注册
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.
ADVERTISEMENT