Experts doubt lasting change to academic work practices post-Covid

Institutions have introduced four-day weeks during lockdowns, but scholars suspect most changes will be temporary

一月 20, 2021
Source: iStock

Many have predicted that the pandemic is likely to permanently change the world of work, but experts were unconvinced that academia would be included in a long-term shift in employment practices.

Some universities have announced short-term policy changes aimed at increasing flexibility and well-being during the crisis. In the UK, the University of Strathclyde told staff this month that they do not have to work on Fridays during the current lockdown, a policy that was initially introduced at the beginning of the first lockdown last March.

Cardiff Metropolitan University vice-chancellor Cara Aitchison also announced that meetings would be limited to 10am to 4pm Mondays to Thursdays to “help staff exercise outdoors in daylight, be on hand for home-schooling and maintain mental health”, while Newcastle University implemented a four-day week during April 2020 to help staff “try and achieve more of a balance between work and home life” and said that it was currently minimising meetings and calls on a Friday.

In continental Europe, Rotterdam School of Management at Erasmus University Rotterdam encouraged staff to “take some time away from email either side of Christmas”, said Rebecca Hewett, an assistant professor at the school.

She added that there had also been an attempt among senior staff to “role-model good behaviour” in terms of taking annual leave and encouraging others to do so last year, instead of apologising for taking time off or stressing that they will be working during their holidays.

However, Dr Hewett, whose own research focuses on the interface between HR policies and everyday working experiences, said she thought it was unlikely that these practices would become the norm post-pandemic.

“I suspect they won’t continue,” she said. “The pressure to publish is still incredibly high.”

A Strathclyde spokesman said that Fridays would still be promoted as a meeting-free day once lockdown measures are lifted, but that it was not exploring a four-day week on a permanent basis.

Gregor Gall, an affiliate research associate at the University of Glasgow and an expert in industrial relations, said that there were likely to be “two contending pressures in a situation where mass vaccination allows a return to some kind of normality”.

The first will be “to go back to the pre-pandemic situation without learning any lessons”. The second will be to “learn lessons from the period of the pandemic by looking at new ways of working, not necessarily by doing any less but by working ‘smarter’”.

“It would be a gross oversimplification to say the former will come from senior management and the latter the staff and their unions – but there is also a lot of truth in that and in this sense much will depend on the extent to which an institution is run in a collegiate manner,” he said.

ellie.bothwell@timeshighereducation.com

后记

Print headline: Experts doubt lasting change to work culture

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
注册
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.

Reader's comments (2)

Another way of looking at it is if senior management like it then everyone will like it and benefit.
The model in this article is a particular type of flexible working which is not necessarily typical - whereas there are many variations on flexibility. For example, I think its very likely that after the pandemic, technology will continue to be used to support remote working, meetings etc so that a larger number of staff will not be expected to be "in work" 9 - 5 every day or only when they need to. There are obvious benefits; less time spent commuting, environmental benefits, reduction in required staff space for the Institution. Conversely, we may see the notion of a normal "standard working day" eroding even further.
ADVERTISEMENT