One committee, bad. . .

九月 27, 1996

Richard Nicholson (THES, September 13) complained that the Nuffield Council on Bioethics report Animal-to-human transplants: the ethics of xenotransplantation did not suggest "how successful animal studies needed to be before starting human trials".

The report proposed an advisory committee on xenotransplantation that would approve any trials involving human recipients and the centres that may undertake such trials. The report went on to state: "No xenotransplantation trials involving human recipients should proceed until the proposed committee [. . .] is in place [. . .]."

To the best of my knowledge no one in this country has suggested that the assessment of the animal trials should be left to the research ethics committee of a single institution.

DAVID SHAPIRO Executive secretary Nuffield Council on Bioethics

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
注册
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.
ADVERTISEMENT