Atypical questions

三月 31, 2016

Responding to figures on teaching-only contracts released by Fighting Against Casualisation in Education last week, a spokesperson for Birkbeck, University of London claimed that including their institution in the data was unfair, as Birkbeck employs many part-time teaching staff “who are reported to Hesa as ‘typical’; whereas most institutions record part-time staff as ‘atypical’, rendering them invisible in this data” (“Universities ‘most reliant’ on teaching-only staff named”, 15 March).

There is, in fact, no “typical” category in the Hesa Staff Record. Furthermore, according to Hesa’s own guidance, the “atypical” category covers jobs that are very short-term, one-off or involve flexible or remote working. Examples given include “answering phones during clearing” and “organising a conference”. Teaching company schemes and teaching related to distance learning are specifically excluded, with the implication that ordinary teaching would be an even worse fit for the category. At no point does the guidance mention part-time contracts.

If institutions are systematically misreporting teaching staff as atypical, this is an entirely different – and perhaps more serious – issue than the one raised by Birkbeck.

Fighting Against Casualisation in Education (FACE)


Send to

Letters should be sent to: THE.Letters@tesglobal.com
Letters for publication in Times Higher Education should arrive by 9am Monday.
View terms and conditions.

请先注册再继续

为何要注册?

  • 注册是免费的,而且十分便捷
  • 注册成功后,您每月可免费阅读3篇文章
  • 订阅我们的邮件
注册
Please 登录 or 注册 to read this article.
ADVERTISEMENT