Nobelist: scientific success ‘no barrier’ to work-life balance

Berkeley biologist Randy Schekman tells researchers to stop ‘posting pet photos’ if they want to leave the lab on time

June 29, 2023

A Nobel laureate has challenged the idea that scientific leadership is incompatible with family life, suggesting that if researchers want to improve their work-life balance they should spend less time on social media.

In a discussion of the postdoc recruitment crisis faced by some American research universities, Randy Schekman, who won the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2013, said the shortage of qualified candidates related to a perception that scientists must devote their evenings and weekends to their work to achieve success.

“Many young scholars look at mentors and decide ‘this is not the work-life balance that I want’,” the University of California, Berkeley professor told an audience at the annual Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting.

However, the US molecular biologist said he did not subscribe to this type of long-hours culture, which he believed was unnecessary.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I had children, and I was home to see them grow and mature – I would not have given that up for anything,” said Professor Schekman, who has been a Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator based at Berkeley since 1991.


Campus resource: Good daily work habits for early career researchers


“If you organise your day in advance – and do not spend time posting picture of pets on the web – you can get things done,” the founding editor-in-chief of the eLife journals continued. “I see no barrier to having a successful career and a family life.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The postdoc recruitment crisis was a “problem I’ve seen among my colleagues”, said Professor Schekman, who added that the increasing difficulty in obtaining visas for talented overseas researchers was another “political” element of the recruitment challenge.

Martin Chalfie, who won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 2008, said disruptions caused by the pandemic might have led more researchers to consider other industries beyond academia.

“We have just been through a horrible time when people were working remotely and it was hard to get back to the lab. Because of the whole Covid pandemic, and the frustrations of research, people are saying ‘Do I want a straight academic career?’” said the Columbia University biologist.

However, this presented an opportunity for early-career scientists seeking research posts, continued Professor Chalfie, who said he was among those seeking new postdocs.

“It should not be a negative. People have noticed fewer people are applying for postdocs, so it’s an opportunity if you want to do something good,” he said.

jack.grove@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Register
Please Login or Register to read this article.

Related articles

Five years ago, a THE poll painted a bleak picture of work-life balance in the academy. Has the subsequent rise of homeworking eased the pressure? Or are ever-increasing workloads outweighing any benefits of flexibility? Tom Williams reports on our survey of 1,200 university staff

10 November

Reader's comments (1)

I am glad that early career academics are pushing for a work life balance by not applying for jobs in academia. The older generation of academics believe that 'burning the midnight oil' is a badge of honour. It is not. Just leads to an anti social and dysfunctional person who cannot support anyone in need including their own family members. It needs an attitudinal shift in the older generation and significant push back against working yourself to an early grave from those in their early careers for this punishing work regime to end.

Sponsored

ADVERTISEMENT