English regulator launches spelling and grammar standards review

‘Patronising’ to expect lower standards from students from disadvantaged backgrounds, says OfS following newspaper report

June 23, 2021
Spelling mistake
Source: iStock

England’s higher education regulator has launched a review of “inclusive” assessment practices that allegedly disregard poor spelling and grammar, warning that it would be “patronising” to expect lower standards from students from non-traditional backgrounds.

The Office for Students took action after a report in The Mail on Sunday claimed that some institutions had told academics that insisting on good written English discriminated against ethnic minorities and those who went to “underperforming” schools.

The newspaper reported that Hull University had told markers that requiring high proficiency in written English could be seen as “homogenous, North European, white, male, and elite”. The institution said that students should be encouraged to develop a “more authentic academic voice…that celebrates, rather than obscures, their particular background or characteristics”.

The University of the Arts London reportedly issued guidelines saying that staff should “actively accept spelling, grammar or other language mistakes that do not significantly impede communication unless the brief states that formally accurate language is a requirement”. It warned academics to “avoid imposing your own idea of ‘correct English’ on student work”.

ADVERTISEMENT

According to the newspaper, the University of Worcester told staff that if spelling and grammar were not “central to the assessment criteria”, it was fairer to judge students on their ideas and knowledge of the subject.

The OfS said that its review would identify areas of good practice as well as areas where it was “likely to have future regulatory concerns”.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Rigorous assessment practices are essential if students’ qualifications are to stand the test of time,” said Susan Lapworth, the OfS’ director of regulation. “Students from all backgrounds should expect a high-quality academic experience and a qualification that reflects their achievements.

“We have been clear that standards should not be reduced for particular groups of students and it is patronising to expect less from some students under the guise of supporting them. Effective academic writing requires good spelling, punctuation and grammar from all.”

The OfS has said that it wants to reduce the gap between the proportion of white and ethnic minority students gaining good degrees, and to cut dropout rates among disadvantaged learners.

But Ms Lapworth said it was “a matter of strong public interest that the English higher education sector is able to demonstrate that the degrees it awards to students are a reliable indicator of academic achievement and that high standards are maintained”.

chris.havergal@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Register
Please Login or Register to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (5)

Universities located in *England* cannot expect its students and staff to be proficient in *English* - this is the stage HE has come to! The 'leaders' in universities who are involved in passing this policy ought to be taken to task for diluting HE standards!
Academic standards are not reducible to linguistic performance skills, just as relying on an impressive presentation by a job applicant will not tell you whether they will be a competent employee. In the education system in Britain (at whatever level) we have a tendency to over-value essays by the quality of exposition, rather than by the content of their argument. To cut to the chase, English fluency is not a good criterion for academic excellence in a particular subject. When assessing mathematics, one uses a mathematics standard; in architecture, an architectural one, and so on.
Not true. In every academic field, even maths and architecture (!), individuals must be capable of expressing themselves with clarity, accuracy and precision. The quality of the exposition is not separate from the content of the argument.
Sure, continue with this type of inane argument is what is contributing to UK students who can't read, can't write, and can't do maths! https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-57499286
Teaching Computer Science in a Sixth Form college prior to my current role in academia, some students grumbled that I expected better English from them than their English teachers had! I had 2 points to make in response: firstly, they might be the only 'computer person' in a company & might need to explain things clearly to non-technical people and secondly, computers are really stupid: they do precisely what you tell them to. They cannot guess what you are on about, what you input must be accurate and correct. If a student writes 'costumer' I can guess they really intended to say 'customer', but a computer would not! They saw the point... and one, who was dyslexic, came for lessons in formal proofreading techniques so that he could check his code (and serendipitously improved his written English!). When I mark work done under conventional examination conditions I ignore errors in spelling, punctuation, and grammar. When students submit reports or essays I expect them to take the trouble to get it right.

Sponsored

ADVERTISEMENT